Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

KAILASHO @ KAILASHO DEVI AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 30677/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
KAILASHO @ KAILASHO DEVI AND ANR
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-30677-2026 (O&M) -1- 106 pees 2026:PHHC-083940 ae ae Oates carretas) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30677-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 Kailasho @ Kailasho Devi and another ...Petitioner(s) vs. State of Punjab ...Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Rajesh Kapila, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Ekakshra Mandhar, Advocate, for the complainant. 22K 2K N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/438 Cr.P.C., for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.47 dated 02.05.2026, registered under Sections 331(6), 324(4), 118(1), 115(2), 190, 191(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNS) (corresponding Sections 458, 427, 324, 323, 148, 149 of IPC) and Section 117(2) of BNS added later on, at Police Station Purana Shalla, District Gurdaspur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that as per the allegations levelled by the complainant, petitioner no.1 was empty handed and only Jalkara was attributed to her. As per learned counsel, petitioner no.2 was armed with a baseball bat