K K BANSAL vs KONINKLIJKE ELECTRONICS NV

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 17 December 2025 Pronounced on: 18 May 2026 RFA(OS)(COMM) 17/2018, CM APPL. 31483/2018, CM APPL. 26137/2023, CM APPL. 38867/2023, CM APPL. 38868/2023 & CM APPL. 66350/2024 K K BANSAL .....Appellant Through: Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, Mr. Naveen Nagarjuna, Mr. Ritik Raghuwanshi, Mr. Kartik Malhotra, Mr. Anindit Mandal and Ms. Shreya Mansi James, Advs. versus KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NV .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Vaishali R Mittal, Mr. Siddhant Chamola and Mr. Gursimran Singh Narula, Advs. RFA(OS)(COMM) 18/2018, CM APPL. 31488/2018, CM APPL. 25194/2023, CM APPL. 38819/2023, CM APPL. 38820/2023 & CM APPL. 66349/2024 RAJESH BANSAL .....Appellant Through: Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, Mr. Naveen Nagarjuna, Mr. Ritik Raghuwanshi, Mr. Kartik Malhotra, Mr. Anindit Mandal and Ms. Shreya Mansi James, Advs. versus KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N V .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. 1. Standard Essential Patents1 are strange and complex creatures. Infringement litigation, involved SEPs, is delicate and involved. For a plaintiff,