JYOTI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 161+162+163+177 CWP-17427-2026 Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 JYOTI ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ...Respondents And Sr. Case No. Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) No. 2. CWP-17428-2026 Sudesh State of Haryana and Anr. 3. CWP-17430-2026 Raman Kumari State of Haryana and Anr. 4. CWP-17602-2026 Mukesh Kumar State of Haryana and Anr. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G. Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. As common issues are involved in the captioned petitions, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from CWP-17427-2026. 2. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of communication dated 22.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) whereby her claim for compensation under Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Antyodaya Parivar Suraksha Yojna (for short ‘Deen Dayal Yojna’) has been rejected on the ground of delay. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.27 15:49 I attest to the accuracy and aut