Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

JULLUNDUR MOTOR AGENCY DELHI LIMITED vs PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR

Citation / case number
CWP 28239/2017
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
JULLUNDUR MOTOR AGENCY DELHI LIMITED
Respondent
PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

227 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28239-2017 Date of Decision:19.05.2026 JULLUNDUR MOTOR AGENCY DELHI LIMITED .....Petitioner VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ANR. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate, for respondent no.2. KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) 1. Through the instant petition, cast under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the Award dated 01.11.2017 (Annexure P-1), whereby the reference was answered in favour of respondent no.2-workman, however, instead of granting reinstatement, he was granted lump sum compensation amounting to Rs.1,50,000/-. 2. The said was payment, as directed, to be made by the petitioner-management within a period of 08 weeks from the date of the Award, and failing which, respondent no.1-workman, was held entitled to interest at the rate of 9% p.a. DHARAM VIR 2026.05.20 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28239-2017 -2- 3. This Court has heard both learned counsel for the parties, at length. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for t