Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-05-15

JUBILANT FOODWORKS LIMITED vs SITA RAM SOKHAL

Citation / case number
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)-202/2026 2026:DHC:4328
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
JUBILANT FOODWORKS LIMITED
Respondent
SITA RAM SOKHAL
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 15.05.2026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 202/2026 & I.A. 13166/2026 (Ex.) JUBILANT FOODWORKS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rishi K. Awasthi and Mr. Rahul Raj Mishra, Advocates along with Mr. Nrip Vaibhaw, AR. versus SITA RAM SOKHAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Aditya Ganju, Mr. Auritro, Mukherjee, Mr. Samanyu Sethi, Mr. Vatsal Agrawal, Mr. Sahil Safdar and Mr. Alzafary MK, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present Petition, filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”] read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeks the following ad interim reliefs:- “A. Pass an order of interim injunction restraining the Respondent from acting upon or giving effect to the Reply-Cum- Termination Notice dated 16.03.2026 issued by the 2. The present disputes are stated to have arisen out of an undated Lease Deed [“Agreement”] executed between the parties, which is stated to have commenced and come into force on 01.11.20