Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-08

JOGINDER @ CHINTU vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 11623/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
JOGINDER @ CHINTU
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

203 eee 2026:PHHC:072088 sareascrs IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11623-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 08.05.2026 JOGINDER @ CHINTU «PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .+s RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Dr. Pankaj Nanhera, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Duhan, Advocate and Ms. Ishita Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. The instant petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023 (Section 438 of Cr.P.C.) has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 14 dated 13.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act (Section 27A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 added later on) registered at Police Station City Ratia, District Fatehabad, Haryana. 2. This Court vide order dated 22.04.2026, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order dated 22.04.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 4. Learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and fur