Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

JEET SINGH vs MUKHTIAR SINGH

Citation / case number
CR 3687/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
JEET SINGH
Respondent
MUKHTIAR SINGH
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

megs 2026:PHHC:068177 Sates -1- 120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3687-2026 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 JEET SINGH .... Petitioner Versus MUKHTIAR SINGH ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present revision petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by petitioner-judgment debtor being aggrieved by impugned order dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure P-5) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nabha whereby on furnishing of security equivalent to principle amount by petitioner-judgment debtor, execution has been stayed in view of order dated 08.09.2025 passed by this Court, however, attached property of petitioner-judgment debtor was not released. 2. In present case, only security qua principle amount has been furnished and not qua entire decretal amount which includes interest of 9% per annum from date of execution of pronote and receipt till date of decree and 6% per annum future interest till realization of full and final amount, which was awarded by learned Court of First Instance vide judgment and decree dated 20.02.2018.