Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-15

JD SANDHU vs THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
RA-CW 138/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
JD SANDHU
Respondent
THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-4101-CWP-2026 in/and RA-CW-138-2026 in CWP-9380-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.05.2026 J.D SANDHU ........Review Applicant VERSUS THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH, CHANDIGARH THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR AND OTHERS ........Non-applicant/Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. J.D Sandhu, Review Applicant in person. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) CM-4101-CWP-2026 in RA-CW-138-2026 This is an application for condonation of delay of 160 days in filing the review application. 2. For the reasons recorded, the application is allowed. Delay of 160 days in filing the review application, is condoned. RA-CW-138-2026 1. The present review application has been filed by the petitioner in person. 2. On being asked to point out any factual aspect which has been incorrectly recorded and has been relied upon to reach the conclusion so as SAPNA GOYAL 2026.05.19 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-4101-CWP-2026 in/and RA-CW-138-2026 in CWP-9380-2017 (O&M) -2- to justify the review, the review applicant/petitioner in person has