Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-29

JANAK RAJ vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 23827/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
JANAK RAJ
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 219 CRM-M-23827-2026 Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 JANAK RAJ ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Gurminder Singh Salana, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Manjot Kaur, AAG, Punjab. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody only for a period of 03 months and 26 days and his voice sample is yet to be taken, in view of which, his learned counsel does not press the instant petition at this stage. 2. Ordered accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) MAY 29, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.05.29 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order