JAIPAL SINGH vs STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AND ANOTHER

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 104 CWP-27913-2025 Date of Decision: 21.05.2026 JAIPAL SINGH …Petitioner Versus DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AND ANOTHER …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Arjun Shukla, Advocate with Mr. Charanjiv Singh Rana, Advocate, Mr. Abhimanyu Kaushal, Advocate and Mr. Rishab Dhiman, Advocate for petitioner *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent No.1-District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab (for short ‘District Commission’) to decide Execution Application No. 119 of 2023 in a time bound manner. 2. The petitioner filed Execution Application No. 119 of 2023 before District Commission seeking compliance of order dated 17.10.2023 passed in Complaint No. 156 of 2021 whereby respondent No.2 was directed to refund the amount of plot with interest @9% per annum and pay compensation to the tune of ₹30,000/- and expenses of ₹5,000/-. He filed SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.21 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- Execution Application bef