Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

JAI SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

Citation / case number
CRM-M 29890/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
JAI SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-29890-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 135 CRM-M-29890-2026 Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 JAI SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Ms. Sonia Bohat, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of order dated 11.07.2022 and 12.07.2023 passed by ld. JMIC, Karnal vide which proclamation under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C (Section 84 of the BNSS) in complaint case No . NACT-59-2019 tilted as Shri Ram City Vs Mahaluxmi Auto under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act; quashing of order dated 28.09.2022 and 31.08.2023 passed by ld. JMIC, Karnal with a further prayer to quash all subsequent proceedings including case FIR No. 927 dated 08.11.2022 under Section 174-A of the IPC (Section 209 of BNS, 2023) registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Karnal and the charge-sheet under Section 173 Cr.P.C (Seciton193 of BNSS) filed in consequence thereof. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the present FIR is the outcome of a criminal complaint filed against the petitioner under Section