Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25
JAI PRAKASH vs SUDHIR RAJPAL AND ANOTHER
- Citation / case number
- COCP 2237/2026
- Court
- Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Petitioner
- JAI PRAKASH
- Respondent
- SUDHIR RAJPAL AND ANOTHER
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105(44) COCP-2237-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.05.2026 Jai Prakash ...Petitioner Versus Sudhir Rajpal and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents-State has submitted that against the judgment dated 23.12.2025 which was passed by the Single Bench in bunch of petitions, LPA has been filed and the said LPA has been disposed of by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.05.2026, operative part of which is reproduced hereinbelow:- “6. In that view of the matter, we dispose of this batch of appeals with a direction upon the State to examine individual cases of the respondents – writ petitioners for regularization, keeping in view the policy in the light of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Madan Singh (supra), as also the judgment of this Court in LPA-1810-2025 (supra). 7. Till specific orders as directed by the learned Single Judge are passed by the authorities, status quo with regard to working of the employees