JAI PRAKASH @ LEELA RAM vs STATE OF HARYANA

338 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.25472 of 2026 Date of decision: 13.05.2026 Jai Parkash @ Leela Ram …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana for the respondent-State. Mr. L.K. Gollen, Advocate for the complainant. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. This is the first petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 438 Cr.P.C.) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.22 dated 31.01.2026 registered under Sections 109(1), 115, 190, 191(3), 333, 351(3) BNS (corresponding Sections 307, 323, 149, 148, 452, 506 IPC) at Police Station Rohtak Sadar, District Rohtak. 2. Briefly stated, the present FIR was registered on the complaint of Vikas Beniwal, who alleged that on 26.01.2026, his sons had gone to their another house situated on Ladhaut-Bhaiyapur Road. At that time, one Mandeep, in an intoxicated condition, hit the complainant’s parked car with NEETU RANI 2026.05.13 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD