Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

JAI PARKASH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 32110/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
JAI PARKASH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

2026:PHHC:077649 Seeaeeer. ee: Saas 279 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-32110-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 18.05.2026 JAI PARKASH .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. G.S. Gopera, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Mr. Teevar Sharma, DAG, Haryana. 22K 2K SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to re-fix the pension of the petitioner by granting annual increment to him for the services rendered by him in the preceding one year from the respective date of his retirement and release arrears alongwith interest at the rate of 18% p.a., in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case titled as "The Director (Administration and HR) KPTCL and others Vs. C.P. Mundinamani and others, 2023 SCC Online SC 401", further followed by this Hon'ble High Court in case bearing CWP No. 8364 of 2024 titled as "Suresh Kumar Singla and others Vs. State of Haryana ANURADHA 2026.05.19 21:55 I atte