JAGIR RAM vs CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH AND OTHERS

CWP-32299-2019 1 219 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-32299-2019 Date of decision : 19.05.2026 Jagir Ram ...Petitioner Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Rishav Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in the present petition is to the impugned order dated 09.10.2019 (Annexure P-3) passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’) in OA No.060/01262/2017, whereby the claim of the petitioner qua release of pensionary benefits w.e.f. 01.06.2014 has been rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without giving any reason as to how the respondents have calculated the qualifying service to be of 09 years and 04 months so as to deny the pensionary benefits on the ground that the petitioner failed to complete the 10 years of qualifying service whereas, the fact remains that the period between the date of appointment and the date of superannua