Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-20

JAGDISH HOODA vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 14077/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
JAGDISH HOODA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203 CRM-M-14077-2026 Date of decision : 20.05.2026 JAGDISH HOODA ...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Ashish Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, Asstt. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Hemen Aggarwal, Advocate for the complainant. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH. J.(Oral) 1. This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.11 dated 21.01.2026, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120-B and 506 of Indian Penal Code, Police Station Sector-17, District Faridabad. VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.21 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-14077-2026 2 2. Briefly stating the facts emerging from record are that the FIR of this case came into being at the instance of ‘Suresh Aggarwal’, hereinafter being referred to as complainant only. It was alleged by the complainant that he was in the business of supplying building material and ‘Tarcoal’, and that