ISHWAR NAND vs STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206 CRM-M-21736-2026 Date of decision: 25th May, 2026 Ishwar Nand ...Petitioner Versus State of U.T., Chandigarh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, PP, U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the complainant. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter having been passed over thrice. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. Hence, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Since the main petition has been dismissed for non-prosecution, pending application(s), if any, stand rendered infructuous. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 25th May, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.05.25 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document