ISHIKA VERMA vs ANUJ KUMAR PANDEY

Judgment text excerpt

$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 841/2026 ISHIKA VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Krishan Maggu, Mr. Vikas Sareen, Ms. Oshin Maggu, Mr. Aryan Nagpal and Ms. Mehak Sharma, Advs. versus ANUJ KUMAR PANDEY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gibran Naushad, SSC and Mr. Suraj Shekhar Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL.31618/2026 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 841/2026 3. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the order dated 20.02.2026, passed in W.P.(C) 2457/2026. The same reads as under: “W.P.(C) 2457/2026 3. Heard. 4. The present writ petition is disposed of with the observation that the representation of petitioner for re-export pending with the respondent be decided expeditiously and, in any case, within a period of eight weeks from today. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT CONT.CAS(C) 841/2026 Page 1 of 2 KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 11:31:41 5. In case, no representation has been preferred by the petitioner, the present writ petition, itself, be treated as representation. 6. Needless to clarify, the merits of the matter are not appreciated.” 4. Learned counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance notice submits that a hearing has been scheduled on 18.05.2026 at 10.00 AM. 5. It is submitted that after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the representation of the petitioner shall be disposed of by way of a speaking order. Let the same be passed within a period of four weeks from the conclusion of the hearing. 6. It is assured and undertaken that the representation of the petitioner shall be decided with an open mind, taking into accou