Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-20

IRSHAD vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 10517/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
IRSHAD
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.10517 of 2026 1 CRM-M No.16536 of 2026 204+209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.10517 of 2026 Irshad .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ..... Respondent CRM-M No.16536 of 2026 Rashid @ Mohd. Rashid ….. Petitioner versus State of Haryana ….. Respondent Date of decision: 20.05.2026 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ **** Present :- Mr. Aman Arora, Advocate and Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-10517-2026. Mr. Parminder Singh Sekhon, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shefali, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-16536-2026. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, A.A.G., Haryana. **** RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. By this order, I dispose of the above mentioned two petitions arising out of the same FIR. 2. Both the petitions have been filed praying for the grant of regular bail to the petitioners in case bearing FIR No.483, dated 04.12.2024, under Sections 21 & 29 of NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Madhuban, District Karnal. RITTU 3. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that the police party, while on 2026.05.20 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M No.10517 of 2026 2 CRM-M No.16536 of 2026 patrolli