INDRA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP-15692-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No. 130 CWP-15692-2026 Decided on:19.05.2026 Indra . . . Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA PRESENT: Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate and Mr. D. S. Maan, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J.(ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the petitioner’s service in view of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.14831 of 2024 titled Jaggo v. Union of India, and grant them all consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case she is permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, and the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified period in light of law laid down. All relevant particulars of the applicant’s service which entitle her to the claimed benefits will be mentioned therein. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, assisted MEHAK HURIA b