INDERJIT KAUR vs STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 CRWP-5411-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:11.05.2026 Inderjit Kaur ... Petitioner Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh & others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. ... Manisha Batra, J. (Oral). The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of appropriate directions to respondents No.2 to 5 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of private respondent No.6 and to take a decision on the complaint dated 08.04.2026 (Annexure P-5) as filed by the petitioner. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.3 to decide or to take necessary action on the aforesaid complaint filed by the petitioner raising her grievance, which has not been considered and no action has been taken till now. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Alankrit Bhardwaj, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, U.T., Chandigarh, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf HARJEET KAUR 2026.05.11 16:49 I attest to the