INDERJIT KAUR AND OTHERS vs UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-5619-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.05.2026 Inderjit Kaur and Others ...Petitioners Versus Union Territory Chandigarh and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Naveen Jhajholia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Chandail, Advocate for respondents No.1, 3 and 4. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of order dated 02.08.2018 (Annexure P-5) whereby respondent has kept their claim in abeyance. They are further seeking direction to respondent to fill up the post of Tutors by promoting them in compliance of directions of Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench. 2. Learned counsel for respondents No.1, 3 and 4 submits that petitioners have effective and efficacious alternative remedy, thus, writ petition should not be entertained. 3. Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that present petition may be transferred to Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short ‘Tribunal’). PRINC