HUDA vs JAI SINGH SAINI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2232-1996 (O&M) HUDA and another . . . . Appellants Vs. Dr. Jai Singh . . . . Respondents **** Reserved on: 18.04.2026 Pronounced on: 04.05.2026 Pronounced fully/opera7ve part: Fully **** CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Argued by:- Ms. Promila Nain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohinder Singh Nain, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Advocate with Mr. Anshuman Sethi, Advocate for the respondent. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. The present Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the defen- dants against the concurrent judgments & decrees passed by the Courts below, whereby the suit for declara)on with consequen)al relief of permanent injunc- )on ins)tuted by the plain)ff was decreed by the learned trial Court vide judg- ment dated 09.08.1995, and the appeal preferred thereagainst was dismissed by the learned Addi)onal District Judge, Karnal on 27.03.1996. 2. To avoid confusion, the par)es are referred to as per their status before the trial Court. 3. The factual matrix, as emerges from the record, is that one Naresh Chand Jain was allo7ed Plot No.5 in Sector-6, Urban Estate, Karnal on 03.05.1982 for a total considera)on of