HITESH KUMAR vs ASHA AGGARWAL AND ORS.

-1- 126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3952-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 HITESH KUMAR ...Petitioner Versus ASHA AGGARWAL AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Ashish Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been preferred under Article 227 of Constitution of India by petitioner/defendant being aggrieved by order dated 19.03.2025 (Annexure P-1), passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Narnaul vide which application preferred by petitioner/defendant under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint was dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner/defendant has argued that learned Court of first instance had only referred to Clause (a) of Order VII Rule 11 CPC, however, had not considered his case under Order VII Rule 11 (d) CPC. It is argued that learned Court of first instance had failed to take into consideration Rules 149, 150 and 154 of Petroleum Rules 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ‘2002 Rules’) read with Section 9 CPC. 3. In the present case, rejection of plaint has been sought by petitioner/defendant on twin grounds; one that cause of action