HIRA LAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

216 IOIN-1-LPA-735-2021 in LPA-735-2021 (O&M) HIRA LAL V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS Present : Mr. B. K. Bagri, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Aman Mittal, DAG, Haryana. -.- As per the office report, notices issued to respondent Nos. 17, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, and 30 have been received back unserved with the report that all these respondents have died. Further, notices issued to respondent Nos. 31 to 33 have also been received back unserved with the report that they are not residing at the given addresses. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that respondent Nos. 5 to 33 are proforma respondents and, therefore, they may be deleted from the array of parties. Ordered accordingly. IOIN stands disposed of. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE ( DEEPAK MANCHANDA ) JUDGE May 29, 2026 Riya RIYA 2026.06.01 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document