HEM RAJ vs ZILE SINGH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (212) RSA No. 751 of 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision : 18.05.2026 Hem Raj ...Appellant Versus Zile Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Saket Bhandari, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Yuvraj Garg, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 3 proceeded against ex parte v.o.d. 24.07.2001. *** Amarinder Singh Grewal, J. (Oral) 1. As per the office report, the sole appellant has expired. Even learned counsel for the appellant on the last date of hearing submitted that she is not in touch with her client. Today also, learned counsel for the appellant pleads his no instructions to appear on behalf of the appellant. 2. In light of the above, the present appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to the LRs of appellant to seek its revival as per law, in case, any cogent cause of action survives. 3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. May 18, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) kanchan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No KANCHAN 2026.05.18 22:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order