HARI PARKASH vs BEERO AND ORS

206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2322-2014 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.05.2026 Hari Parkash ...Petitioner Versus Beero and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Aman Priye Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate and Ms. Devika Kamboj, Advocate for the respondents. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. A perusal of the paper book would show that original judgment and decree of which execution is sought and in which respondent No.1 has been made a party/decree holder has not been annexed along with the present petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the same, the present revision petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same after annexing the judgments and decrees of both the trial Court and the Appellate Court. 3. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the present revision petition is disposed of with liberty aforesaid. 04.05.2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.05.05 09:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document