Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

HARI MOHAN PARSAD vs PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
LPA 2940/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
HARI MOHAN PARSAD
Respondent
PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

LPA-2940-2025 (O&M) -1- 105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-2940-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.05.2026 HARI MOHAN PRASAD ...Appellant(s) VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT-II, FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Ms. Tarannum Madan, Advocate for Ms. Alisha Soni, Advocate for the appellant. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral) CM-7398-LPA-2025 1. The present application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delay of 317 days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant-appellant submitted that the only reason for non-filing of the Letters Patent Appeal within the prescribed period was lack of funds and the delay was not intentional on the part of the applicant-appellant and therefore, the same may be condoned. 3. We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant-appellant. CHETAN THAKUR 2026.05.18 11:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. LPA-2940-2025 (O&M) -2- 4. By way of the judgment dated 30.08.2024 passed b