HARDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER vs KULDEEP SINGH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (115) INCOMP-1033-2026 Date of Decision: 01.05.2026 Hardeep Singh and another ...- Appellants VS Kuldeep Singh ..- Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: None for the appellants. 2k eee VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) 1. The aforesaid appeal was filed on 20.01.2026 by Mr. Raman Mohinder Sharma, Advocate. However, certain objections were raised by the Registry. 2. As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to re-file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken back for refilling after removal of objections. On failure to do the needful, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. 3. Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocate to collect the case for re-filing after rectification of objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. 4. No one has appeared on behalf of the appellants. 5. In view of the aforementioned facts, no further