HARDEEP KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CM-8824-LPA-2025 in/and LPA-3590-2025 120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-8824-LPA-2025 in/and LPA-3590-2025 JUDGEMENT JUDGEMENT OPERATIVE PART UPLOADED ON RESERVED PRONOUNCED PRONOUNCED OR ON ON FULL 02.04.2026 25.05.2026 FULL PRONOUNCED 25.05.2026 Hardeep Kaur ...Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. Manan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the applicant-appellant. Mr. Akshay Kumar, A.A.G., Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. CM-8824-LPA-2025 For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 140 days in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned. Application stands allowed. Main case 1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of petition under Section 23 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 by the SDM concerned and further the dismissal of the writ petition filed by the present appellant by a Single Bench of this Court, now she has come up before this Court by filing the present LPA. 2. We have heard counsel for the appellant to analyze that whether the matter is worth issuing notices or not and its analysis would lead to the following out