HANS RAJ PUNYANI vs BHIM SAIN CHHABRA ETC.

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh Date of Decision:-12.05.2026 (I) FAO-234-1994 (O&M) Hans Raj Punyani … Appellant Versus Bhim Sain Chhabra and another ... Respondents (II) FAO-5351-2002 (O&M) Bhim Sain Chabra … Appellant Versus Hans Ran Punyani ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present:- Mr. Adarsh Jain, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kamaldeep Kaur, Advocate for the appellant in FAO-234-1994 and for the respondent in FAO-5351-2002. Mr. Deep Inder Singh Walia, Advocate, for respondents in FAO-234-1994 and for the appellant in FAO-5351-2002. (through video conferencing) ***** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. The present appeals arise out of proceedings under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act. PANKAJ KAKKAR 2026.05.14 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh FAO-234-1994 (O&M) & FAO-5351-2002 (O&M) (2) 2. The dispute relates to succession of Smt. Raj Rani. Respondent No.1 – Bhin Sen Chabra, father of Raj Rani, and Hans Raj Punyani, husband of Raj Rani, are fighting to claim succession. 3. Mr. Adarsh Jain, Senior Advocate, fairly submitted that subsequent to the pr