H.L MATTOO vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 128 CRM-22506-2026 & CRM-22507-2026 IN CRM-M-35076-2024 Date of Decision: 22.05.2026 H.L MATTOO ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Ashish Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Saroha, DAG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) CRM-22506-2026 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Accordingly, the main case is ordered to be restored at its original number and stage. Registry to make necessary entries in the record. CRM-22507-2026 in/and CRM-M-35076-2024 1. By way of instant application, the petitioner has sought withdrawal of the main petition in order to file the same afresh after incorporating the new section that has been added to the FIR during the investigation. 2. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the same. 3. Ordered accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) MAY 22, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.05.25 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order