Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

GURU DAYAL vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 21668/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
GURU DAYAL
Respondent
STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-21668-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 269 CRM-M-21668-2026 Date of decision:26.05.2025 GURU DAYAL ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA. Present: Mr. Nikhil Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Vashisht, Additional Public Prosecutor, U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. ... MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL). 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short-‘BNSS’) for quashing of FIR No.0030 dated 03.03.2026 registered under Sections 125(A), 281 BNS, at Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 07.04.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. This Court vide order dated 21.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. JYOTI 2026.05.27 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21668-2026 -2- 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared bef