GURPREET SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA

PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.08 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Challan has been presented on 03.12.2025, however, charges are yet to be framed and there are, in all, 21 PWs. He is involved in 1 more case wherein he is on bail. Reliance is placed on the judgment passed by Hon'ble The Supreme Court titled as Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi vs. State of U.P. and others, 2012(2) SCC 382. 3. Hon'ble The Supreme Court in the case of Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi (Supra)had held that, “As observed by the High Court, merely on the basis of criminal antecedents, the claim of the second respondent cannot be rejected. In other words, it is the duty of the Court to find out the role of the accused in the case in which he has been charged and other circumstances such as possibility of fleeing away from the jurisdiction of the Court, etc.” PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.08 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. 7. hallan stands presented on 03.12.2025, but charges have not been framed and there are total 21 PWs; 8. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing requisite bail bond/surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial