GURNAM SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 202 CWP-12383-2008 Date of decision: 14.05.2026 Gurnam Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab. **** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent-department to issue appointment order to the petitioner as he was promoted, vide order dated 16.05.2006 and was posted in Government Middle School Ghurka, District Ferozepur (Annexure P-15). 2. Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate has put in appearance and filed his power of attorney on behalf of the petitioner which is taken on record. He fairly submits that during the pendency of the present petition, the petitioner was issued posting order and, therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 14.05.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) Vinay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VINAY 2026.05.14 18:36 I attest to the accuracy a