Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

GURMUKH SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

Citation / case number
CWP 16781/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
GURMUKH SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

[Openers re O] 2026:PHHC:084140 ea 184 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH KEKK CWP-16781-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 Gurmukh Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Bahul Bunger, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Arora, DAG, Punjab. skok 2K JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents No.2 to 4 to decide his representations (Annexure P-6 and P-7) seeking restraint against Gram Panchayat Village Bal, Tehsil & District Jalandhar through its Sarpanch and representatives from encroaching and obstructing the common passage (Rasta) that leads to his land. He is further seeking removal of illegal encroachments made on the basis of a false demarcation report dated 06.01.2026. He is also seeking direction to the parties to maintain status quo on the land in question. 2. Learned State counsel submits that Competent Authority would carry out fresh demarcation and thereafter right of the petitioner would be determined. 3. Learned counsel representing the petitio