GURMEJ SINGH vs SADHU SINGH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2026: PHHC.078726 (203) RSA-1852-1998 (O&M) Date of Decision:-19.05.2026 GURMEJ SINGH .- Appellant Versus SADHU SINGH AND OTHERS .. . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None for the appellants. Mr. G.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the interveners/applicants in CM-15964-C-2025. Ms. Divya Godara, Advocate, for the respondents, eee VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) I. None has appeared on behalf of the appellants today. Even no reply to the application under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC has been filed on behalf of the appellants. The compliance of order dated 24.03.2026, whereby costs of %2,000/- were imposed upon the appellants, has also not been made. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the present appeal. 2. In these circumstances, the appeal cannot be proceeded any further, and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the present appeal pending indefinitely. 3, Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4, Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping them, (VIRINDER AGGARW