GURMAIL SINGH AND ORS. vs JOGA SINGH AND ORS,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (202) RSA-2417-2004 (O&M) Date of Decision:-13.05.2026 GURMAIL SINGH AND ANOTHER … Appellants Versus JOGA SINGH AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. None is present on behalf of the parties. This is a suit for permanent injunction instituted in the year 1997. It seems that the parties have lost interest in pursuing the appeal. 2. As such, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. As a natural corollary, since the main case stands dismissed for want of prosecution of, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping them pending. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) th 13 May, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.05.14 05:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document