Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

GURDIP SINGH SOHAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

Citation / case number
CWP 5785/2003
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
GURDIP SINGH SOHAL
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Daily Lok Adalat Bench No.1 503 CWP-5785-2003 (O&M) Gurdip Singh Sohal V/S State of Punjab and others Present: Mr. Sushil Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Khangura, A.A.G. Punjab. Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate for respondent No.2-High Court. **** Since on the last date of hearing, none had been appearing on behalf of the petitioner, notice was issued to him to appear in person before this Forum to explore the possibility of settlement. Office report indicates that the petitioner has since expired. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has expired and he has no further instructions in this case, this case may be consigned to record room. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is consigned to the record room, with liberty to the LRs of the petitioner to revive the same by filing an appropriate application before this Forum, if the need arises. A copy of this order be sent to the petitioner/LRs of the petitioner at the given address as well as to his counsel so that they could take appropriate steps for revival of the same. (J.C. VERMA) PRESIDENT (ARVIND KUMAR) 14.05.2026 MEMBER rajeev RAJEEV THAKRA