Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

GURCHARAN SINGH vs UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 11066/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
GURCHARAN SINGH
Respondent
UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CWP-11066-2026 Date of Decision: 19.05.2026 GURCHARAN SINGH ...Petitioner Versus UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Sandeep K. Tada, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jaiveer Chandail, Addl. Standing Counsel, with Mr. Tanvir Singh Attariwala, Jr. Standing Counsel, for the respondents. ***** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Pursuant to previous order passed by this Court, the premises has been inspected and a report dated 07.05.2026 has been filed. On the basis of report, Mr. Chandail submits that a preparatory school is being run on the ground floor of the premises, which is permissible. He, however, states that proceedings are pending before the SDM (South) for 21.05.2026 and the final decision on the show cause notice, Annexure P-2, is to be taken by the SDM, who is the competent authority. 2. In view of the above, counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to place the report before the SDM concerned and file an additional reply. 3. In case the petitioner files an additio