GURBINDER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 123 CWP-16092-2026 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 GURBINDER SINGH …Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. P.K.S. Phoolka, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Vikas Arora, D.A.G., Punjab Mr. Satya Pal Jain, A.S.G. with Mr. Arvind Seth, Senior Panel Counsel For respondent No.2 - U.O.I. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Kaundal, Advocate For respondent Nos. 6 & 7 - ICICI Bank *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to de-freeze his Bank Account maintained with respondent No.6 - ICICI Bank. 2. Mr. Brajesh Kumar Kaundal, Advocate has appeared and filed Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent Nos. 6 & 7. The same is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.26 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent- Bank has frozen petitioner’s account without notice. As per petitioner’s information, the Bank has acted upon directions of La