Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-09

GULZAR KAUR AND ANOTHER vs SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
FAO 6542/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
GULZAR KAUR AND ANOTHER
Respondent
SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH 586 FAO-6542-2023 (O&M) GULZAR KAUR AND ANOTHER V/S SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS Present : Mr.Chander Shekhar Singhal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Amit Jaiswal, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** CM-22641-CII-2023 Learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondent No.2 are ad-idem that the parties to the appeal in question are ready to settle the matter in question in all respects but an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is pending decision. In view of their such stand, delay of 44 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CM is disposed of. FAO-6542-2023 As agreed in terms of statements of learned counsel for the appellant(s), learned counsel of the respondent No.2 (separately recorded), a sum of Rs.2,10,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs and Ten Thousand Only) over and above the amount awarded by the Tribunal is allowed to the appellant(s) in full and final settlement of the claim in this appeal. As per the statement of learned counsel for the appellant(s), the enhanced amount be paid to appellant(s). ANJU GOEL 2026.05.14 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this do