Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

GULSHAN TYAGI vs UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ANR

Citation / case number
CRM-M 25303/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
GULSHAN TYAGI
Respondent
UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-25303-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.216 CRM-M-25303-2026 Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 GULSHAN TYAGI ...Petitioner Versus UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ANR ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Rohit Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. The present is the first regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (previously Section 439 Cr.P.C., 1973) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 160 dated 16.11.2025, registered under Sections 406 IPC [Section 316(2) BNS, 2023], 420 IPC [Section 318(4) BNS, 2023], 120-B IPC [Section 61(2) BNS, 2023] and Section 24 of the Immigration Act, 1983 at Police Station Sector-17 Central, Chandigarh. 2. Briefly stated, the complainant Paras Chhabra alleged that after completing his B.E. from Chitkara University, Baddi, he intended to go abroad for employment and came in contact with the accused persons, who allegedly assured him assistance in obtaining Canadian work permit and Permanent Residency. It is alleged that co-accused Abhinav Dogra, operating from Chetnaya Education Centr