GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR vs KAVITA

Judgment text excerpt

$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 172/2025 and CM APPL. 762/2025 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, CGSC with Ms. Vandana Sachdeva, Mr. Ankit Choudhary, Mr. Sumit Choudhary and Mr. Sushant Rana, Advocates versus KAVITA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sheikh Amina Rehmani, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 07.05.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This writ petition assails judgment dated 14 May 2024 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 in OA 1654/2024. 2. The respondent applied for the post of Constable (Executive) Female in the Delhi Police, consequent to the Delhi Police Examination 2023. She cleared all rounds of the selection and was thereafter subjected to medical examination. A Detailed Medical Examination2 and the Review Medical Examination3 were conducted. 1 “the Tribunal”, hereinafter 2 “DME”, hereinafter Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT WP(C) 172/2025 Page 1 of 5 KUMAR Signing Date:11.05.2026 15:05:14 Both certified the respondent as suffering from reduced visual acuity and low haemoglobin count. 3. The submission of Mr. Raj Kumar, learned CGSC for the petitioners is that as the DME and the RME were concurrent in their finding, the Tribunal erred in directing a fresh medical examination of the respondent. He places reliance on the judgment dated 14 November 2024 of a Division Bench of this Court in WP (C) 13976/2024, Staff Selection Commission v. Brij Kishore Meena, which was one of the writ petitions decided by the judgement of this Court in Staff Selection Commission v. Amit Goswami4. The SLP preferred by Brij Kishore Meena against the decision of this Court, he submits, was also dismissed by the Supreme Court vide