GOLU vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

1 CWP-17981-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 144 CWP-17981-2026 Date of decision:29.05.2026 Golu .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Sonak, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Baltej Singh Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Mannat Khurana, Advocate and Ms. Reema, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ, order or direction, especially in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to pay/grant subsistence allowance to the petitioner at the rate of 50% for the first six months and thereafter the enhanced amount of subsistence allowance under PARUL VERMA 2026.05.29 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. 2 CWP-17981-2026 Rule 7.2 of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume-I, along with interest @ 12% per annum from the date it became due till the date of actual payment, and further to consider and decide the reinstatement/revocation of suspension in accordance with