Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-01

GOGAN BAI vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 5358/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
GOGAN BAI
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-5358-2026 (O&M) 1 ~ 2026:PHHC:067543 $e siarerces IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-5358-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 01.05.2026 GOGAN BAI «+s PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB «+e RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. This is the first petition under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of Regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 15 dated 19.07.2024 U/s 21/27A/29/61/85 of NDPS Act, 1985 registered at Police Station State Special Operations Cell, Fazilka, District Fazilka. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and no contraband or drug money has been recovered from her possession. It is submitted that the alleged recovery of 42 grams of heroin was effected from the conscious possession of co-accused Jaspal Singh, and the recovery of drug money amounting to Rs.25 lakhs was made pursuant to the disclosure statements of co-accused Jaspal Singh and Dilshan Singh from their house. It is further argued that the petitioner has been roped in merely on the basis of