Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

GOBIND RAM vs THE PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Citation / case number
CWP 15441/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
GOBIND RAM
Respondent
THE PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-15441-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 121 CWP-15441-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.05.2026 Gobind Ram and others ....Petitioners Versus The Pepsu Road Transport Corporation and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for the respondents. HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to grant pension and retiral benefits to the petitioners in accordance with the Old Pension Scheme as per existence prior to 01.01.2004 instead of treating them as members of CPF and pay the differential amount to the petitioner along with interest @ 12%. Further prayer has been made to direct the respondents to pay interest @ 12% on account of delayed payment of gratuity, etc. 2. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that once the petitioners have been regularized, they cannot be denied the benefit of the service rendered by them as part-ti