GHANSHYAM vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 252-2 CWP-28687-2022 Date of decision: 18.05.2026 Ghanshyam .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Mr. Bhim Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. **** NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari, for quashing the order dated 28.11.2022 (Annexure P-11), vide which the service of the petitioner was terminated due to registration of criminal case as alleged in the impugned order. Further, a writ has been sought for directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue working as Peon till the function of the posts subsists or till the regular selections are made. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been allowed to rejoin his duties, therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 18.05.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) Vinay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VINAY 2026.05.18 18:4