GAURAV KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

239 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1258-2023 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 18.05.2026 GAURAV KUMAR ....-PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. D.S.Punia, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Mr. Teevar Sharma, DAG, Haryana. 2K SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of an appropriate writ particularly in the nature of nature of certiorari to quash the enquiry report dated 18.11.2022 (Annexure P-4) as well as recovery letter dated 11.1.2023 (Annexure P-5) vide which recovery of Rs.1,50,000/- as honorarium and Rs.39,000/- as travelling allowance has been illegally ordered to be recovered from the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has withdrawn the impugned order, hence, the instant petition has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, the instant petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 18.05.2026 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable “Yes/No ANURADHA 2026.05.19 22: