GAJANAND vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CWP-15734-2026 Date of decision: May 20, 2026 GAJANAND ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Laxman Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent no.2 to regularise the services of the petitioner on the post of Sweeper with effect from 01.11.2000 instead of 18.12.2015, as the similarly situated employee who was appointed on the same date as the petitioner, has also been regularised with effect 01.11.2000. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to decide his pending legal notice, dated 10.04.2026, Annexure P-10, in a specified period. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Learned State counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that the pending legal notice, dated 10.04.2026, Annexure P-10, will be decided by respondent no.2/Director, JASPREET KAUR 2026.05.22 12:43 I attest to the a